I checked whether ChatGPT can cite the top 50 news sites. 38 are invisible — most by accident.
Our take: Empirical analysis of ChatGPT citation gaps; useful data but not novel finding.
Why Impact & Innovation? We ask two questions of every story: did this actually change something in the real world (Impact), and is the idea genuinely new (Innovation)? Together, that's the TS Score — not engagement, not who posted it, just what matters and what's new.
Thirty-eight of the top 50 news sites block AI retrieval agents in their robots.txt files, making them invisible to ChatGPT citations despite their Google search rankings.
Read the full article at Dev.toOpens Dev.to's site in a new tab
Got a take on "I checked whether ChatGPT can cite the top 50 news sites. 38 are invisible — most by accident."?
Spin Up drafts a post about this story for you — blog, LinkedIn, or X — in your own voice, sourced and attributed automatically.
More stories ranked this high
Similar TS Score, same beat — ranked the same way the Top feed ranks everything.
Read it. Write your take. Publish it.
This page is one stop in a loop built for anyone whose career depends on staying sharp in tech.
Get it delivered, or hear it argued out loud
Same ranking, two formats — read the newsletter in two minutes, or let Harika & Rohan debate it in your ears.
Today's ranked stories, in your inbox.
Daily and weekly editions — no fluff, just what actually scored.
Two AI hosts debate the week's biggest stories.
Listen NowReady to publish your own take?
Read it, rank it, write about it, publish it — free during early access.
Request an invite →